It’s coming to 2008, a year after Singapore’s move to a wireless broadband nation through the launch of Wireless@SG. So how has Wireless@SG fare since it’s rather quiet launch early this year? Some would say that it didn’t live up to expectation and it was a failure. Well, I beg to differ.
When the prime minister, Mr. Lee Hsien Loong, announced that
Background on Wireless@SG
Starting from 2007, Wireless@SG will be free for a period of 3 years (it was 2 years but they extended it). However, free wireless services are limited to 512Kbps although one can opt for a premium service with a small price tag. This premium service offers speeds up to 1Mbps.
Currently, there are three players providing the wireless service. Namely, they are iCell, Singtel and Qmax. There are about 5000 wireless hot-spots around the island. Most of these hot-spots are limited to a certain area, namely fast-food restaurants, coffee-joints, selected eateries, some shopping malls, public libraries, hospitals, community centres and selected bus-interchanges.
Users who want to connect to the wireless services have to register online first. One can register to any of the network providers. Users who are currently subscribing to broadband connections can use their broadband username and password to log into the Wireless@SG virtual private network.
The Advantages of having Wireless@SG.
The most obvious advantage is of course, mobility. Since it is easy to connect to the internet islandwide, there’s probably nothing to stop you from doing almost anything possible online. From video conferencing to VoIP. You can watch YouTube, do bank transactions online (but I still prefer to do it in the safety of my home network), P2P and the list goes on. Businesses thrive on mobility. Thus, it’s a huge plus factor for those in need of a mobile internet connection.
Wireless@SG provides broadband access to almost everyone in
Setbacks of Wireless@SG
Sadly, Wireless@SG is not free of problems (well, you can’t expect a perfect implementation). One of the problems that most users face (in fact it is the most noticeable and absolutely irritating) is the inability to stay connected. Personally, I find this the biggest setback of the whole idea of an islandwide wireless connection. Not forgetting that WiFi is wireless fidelity and not wireless in-fidelity! Geez.. The problem doesn’t lie with the signal that my WiFi receiver is getting. In my personal experience at different locations, even at full signal strength, I’ll get disconnected. The first symptom of an upcoming disconnection is a slow loading webpage. Then, the browser will return a timeout connection. And when you refresh your browser, you’ll be greeted with the same-irritating-login-page again. Your MSN (or whatever chat clients) will be disconnected when this happens. Surprisingly, this happens without a drop of signal strength.
Hence, I am not sure whether the router disconnects a user after a certain period of time or whether is there any technical glitch.
In most cases, Wireless@SG does not live up to its published speeds. Download speeds are kind of sluggish most of the times and response time is not very good (so you can’t expect to play an online game one a server). Most of the times, download speeds only reach up to 100++ Kbps (provided you get a good connection and there are limited users sharing the connection). I guess it’s not much to ask for since it’s a free service. Furthermore, it still provides broadband connection anyway.
On top of under-rated speeds, there are many complaints regarding the quality of WiFi connection in the hotspot zones (try google Wireless@SG+problems). The reason is simple. One router to a large room with thick walls won’t yield 100% signal strength at areas which are blocked. Furthermore, there will be some areas in the room which will experience the “dead zone”. Dead zones are areas in the WiFi hotspots that do not get good quality signals or no coverage at all. This happens when there is a cancellation of signals as these signals destructively converge at that spot.
Lastly, Wireless@SG isn’t a “true wireless” service. One is still limited to the vicinity of the WiFi coverage. Hence, if you want to surf at your residential void deck, you are left with two options. Tap into someone else’s network (some residents still do not bother to encrypt their wireless connection) or subscribe to wireless broadband available (like WiMax and HSDPA aka 3.5G) locally. However, the latter needs a modem (typically a USB plug-and-play modem) and it isn’t free!
Conclusion
Although Wireless@SG has provided Singaporeans and people residing in
The whole idea of a wireless
Wireless@SG is will not fail because the demand is there. However, should the Wireless@SG initiative be limited to WiFi hotspots? Remember that WiFi has a limited coverage. There could be other technologies that can compliment WiFi coverage, for example WiMax or HSDPA.
It is a dream to have a wireless connection anywhere on the island through Wireless@SG (I’m not talking about paid services here). I guess the whole idea behind Wireless@SG is mobility. Although it does provide mobility to a certain extent, there is still that hotspot zone restriction that hinders true mobility. Hence, the objective of Wireless@SG is somewhat not thoroughly met yet. Therefore, we can’t really judge that Wireless@SG is a failure. It just needs more oomph to get it going further!
My advice is — get more engineers to test out networks at participating Wireless@SG hot-spots and fix problems if any. It will be too exhaustive to go to all 5000+ places. Hence, make a feedback system available for users in the Wireless@SG VPN where they can choose their outlets to feedback problems faced, etc. Or you can employ people to test out these wireless networks (similar to the “mystery shoppers” kinda job).






3 responses so far ↓
1 zs // Dec 29, 2007 at 4:58 pm
Well it sounds like you’re stretching Wireless@SG to include the possibility of 3G coverage. 3G will probably fare much better. Which means to say Wireless@SG as it is right now is not going to work.
Your point about manageability issues is very real. I don’t think Wireless@SG enjoys the kind of centralized management like how GSM/3G base stations work. It is basically a nightmare.
2 Daphne Maia // Dec 30, 2007 at 4:14 am
haha, maybe the bad things abt wireless@sg is a conspiracy.. because shortly after the launch of this free wireless service, they started the paid mobile broadband. people who got addicted to having wireless then HAD TO get mobile broadband. haha. ok, maybe i think too much. lol.
anyway. error in ur post: “aesthetically happy”? i think you mean “ecstatically”? then again, ecstatic already implies extreme happiness or a state of ecstasy itself, so “ecstatically happy” would be a redundancy, like “free gift” (commonly used in singapore. which gift isn’t free? haha.
3 Alvin Loh // Dec 30, 2007 at 9:02 am
I kinda gave up on the whole Wireless@sg thing. Recently, I’ve gotten myself one of those Starhub mobile broadband modems and have been a happy baby since. I don’t know about you but seems like everywhere I go, I don’t seem to be able to logon to Wireless@SG except at the Airport. (It figures)
Anyway, I don’t really think that a free model works for Wireless@SG because maintaining all the infrastructure and stuff like this cause money and when revenue is low, I don’t know if the ISP will put in a LOT of effort to ensure that bandwidth is enough for everyone.
Sure, on paper it does look nice. Wow ! The whole island is connected. Yeah. We have all heard that story before.
Leave a Comment